English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48056693      Online Users : 897
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/54723
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54723


    Title: 國民小學校長運用網路社群服務與品牌領導關係之研究 —以Facebook為例
    A case study investigating the use of a social networking service for the purpose of leadership branding - using Facebook as an Illustrative example
    Authors: 尹潔茹
    Wan, Kep Ru
    Contributors: 陳木金
    Chen, Mu Jin
    尹潔茹
    Wan, Kep Ru
    Keywords: 國民小學
    校長
    網路社群服務
    校長品牌領導
    elementary school
    principal
    social networking service
    brand leadership
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 11:33:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在瞭解國民小學校長運用網路社群服務與品牌領導之內涵與現況,並探討與預測其關係,最後依據研究結果提出建議。首先,進行文獻探討,作為研究理論之基礎及發展研究工具之依據;其次,依據教育部編製之一百年度國民小學名錄中抽取25縣市之527位國民小學現任校長,(有效問卷382份),回收情形為預試問卷調查49位國民小學校長,正式問卷382位國民小學校長,以描述統計、獨立樣本T考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關分析、驗證模式分析;最後,依據研究結果進行綜合討論,以形成結論與建議。茲將本研究之主要結論於建議歸納如下:

    壹、國民小學校長運用Facebook與品牌領導之內涵與現況
    一、國民小學校長在「校長運用Facebook量表」及其向度的現況得分大多屬 於中高程度,且以「人際關係」向度的得分最高。
    二、國民小學校長「品牌領導量表」及其向度的現況得分大多屬於中高程度,且 以「校長實施品牌領導的計劃」向度的得分最高。
    貳、不同背景變項的國民小學校長在運用Facebook與品牌領導得分之差異
    情形
    一、國民小學校長的背景變項中,性別、使用Facebook與否、使用Facebook的頻率,在校長運用Facebook得分之差異達顯著水準。
    二、國民小學校長背景變項中,學校規模在校長品牌領導得分之差異達顯著水 準。
    叁、國民小學校長運用Facebook與品牌領導之相關情形
    一、 整體國民小學校長運用Facebook與品牌領導間呈顯著的正相關,且以 「校長運用Facebook」之「共創價值」向度與「國民小學校長品牌領導」之「學校品牌領導架構與流程」相關程度最高。
    肆、驗證本模式之國民小學校長運用Facebook與國民小學校長品牌領導的互動 模式各項適配度指標
    上有潛在變項「校長運用Facebook量表」對下游前在變項「國民小學校長品牌領導」具有顯著的影響力。

    最後,本研究根據研究發現,提出相關建議,俾供教育行政機關、國民小學校長們以及後續研究之參考。
    The main purpose of this research was to investigate the using Facebook for the purpose of Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal in Taiwan. The research methods included literature reviews and questionnaire survey.
    First, the literature review was the basis of argument and for the development of research tools. Secondly, the research instrument was distributed to 527 elementary school principals all over Taiwan and there were 382 valid sample sizes which were used in this study. Using descriptive statistics, Cronbach α, t-test, one- way ANOVA, correlation, and LISREL model, data are analyzed. Finally, the comprehensive discussion was based on the literature reviews, and to make up conclusions and recommendations which were summarized as follows:
    A. In the aspect of elementary school principal using Facebook
    1. Facebook includes four parts: Interaction, Brand Image, Relationship, and Creation value. Except for the perception of “Relationship” have significant influences on elementary school principal using Facebook.
    2. The background variables in gender, if to use Facebook, frequency of usage Facebook have significant influences on elementary school principal using Facebook.
    B. In the aspect of Brand Leadership
    1. The brand leadership includes three parts: the structure and process of school brand leadership, recognizing and stating school brand, principals utilize the plans of brand leadership. Except for the perception of “principals utilize the plans of brand leadership” have significant influences on Brand Leadership.
    2. The background variables in size of school have significant influences on
    Brand Leadership.
    C. In the aspect of the relationship in between the Facebook and Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal
    1. There was a positive correlation existed among Facebook on dimension of “Creation” and Leadership Branding on dimension of “the structure and process of school brand leadership” by the Elementary School Principal.
    D. In the aspect of relationship among the Facebook and Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal
    1. There were positively correlation existed among the Facebook and Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal.

    In the last part, according to the findings and results, the researcher proposed some suggestion for the educational officers and the principals of elementary school, hoping to benefit the improvement and development of education of elementary school in the future.
    Reference: 中文部分
    cacaFly團隊(2011)。Facebook精準行銷術--這樣打廣告最吸客。臺北市 : 電腦 人文化。
    EMBA雜誌第282期(2010年2月出版),網址: http://www.emba.com.tw/ShowArticleCon.asp?artid=7703 (上網日期:2010年05月18日)
    Hanlon, P. (2006)。品牌的七塊拼圖(Primal branding)。臺北:商智文化。品牌八大核心精神。臺北:商智文化。
    方文智(2004)。國民小學知識社群之研究---以嘉義縣為例。未出版,國立中正大學教育研究所,嘉義縣。
    王旭昇(2005)。 網路行銷理論與實務。臺北市: 知城數位科技股份有限公司。
    王霆、陳勇 (2003)。杜拉克談知識管理,水星文化出版。
    王孟邦(2001)。虛擬社群管理、社群績效、與獲利模式關係之探討。國立政治大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    吳思華(2005)。知識經濟以創新為引擎。天下,315,40。
    吳清山、林天祐(2007)。品牌管理。教育資料與研究雙月刊,75,163-164。
    吳永裕(1996)。單親兒童之親子關係、行為困擾與學習適應研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
    吳秉恩 (1992)。組織行為學。台北: 華泰文化事業有限公司。
    吳勉(2010)。口碑行銷與網路社群經營模式分析-以 BIKEID 為例。淡江大學國際商學碩士在職專班學位論文,未出版,臺北市。
    吳清基(2005)。迎接2005台北市教育品質年:談建構優質學校教育環境。教師天地,134,4-8。
    吳富傑(2009)。企業利用 Facebook 平台經營粉絲專頁社群之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
    余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式: SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。
    宋東(2006)。微軟揮灑「未來學校」藍圖。2007年6月9日,取自http://ad.cw.com.tw/cw/2006kids/content05.asp
    李郁樓、蔣世寶, et al.(2011)。探討 Facebook 之認知互動及價值對忠誠度之關聯研究, 設計研究學報,4,50-6。
    李佳純、鄭君良(2001)。虛擬社區介紹,《南華大學社會所電子期刊》(卷第十二期)。
    林孟慧(2009)。國民小學校長運用品牌領導與學校創新經營關係之研究. 國立政治大學教育行政暨政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    林蘋、陳素緩,et al. (2005)。網路社群知識分享影響因素之探討。
    邱慧菁(譯)(2008)。Bhargava, R.。品牌個性影響力:數位時代的口碑行銷。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。
    洪惠芳(譯) (2011)。Dave Kerpen。Likeable Social Media(「讚」起來,開始拉攏顧客變粉絲)。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。
    徐世同 (譯) (2008)。Keller, K. L.。Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity(策略品牌管理)。臺北市: 華泰文化。
    高登第(譯)(2002)。David A.Asker, E. J.。Brand leadership(品牌領導)。臺北市:天下遠見。
    孫健、趙濤(2007)。企業創新經營三部曲。臺北:大利。
    張美美 (2007)。網際網路經營關鍵成功因素之探討: 以網路社群為例。
    張博裕(2011)。國小校長專業學習社群與省思能力關係之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育研究所碩士文論,未出版,臺北市。
    張钿富。教育行政理念與創新。高等教育部。
    陳品宏 (2009)。面對面與 Facebook 之人際互動研究。 臺灣大學資訊管理學研究所學位論文。
    陳廣﹙2006﹚。我家不只賣咖啡:星巴克帝國品牌奇蹟=STARBUCKS. 臺北市: 海洋文化。
    麥慧芬(譯) (2002)。Scott Bedbury & Stephen Fenichell。品牌始終來自人性:領導
    湯志民(2005)。 優質校園營造之實踐: 以政大附中為例。教師天地,139,12-19。
    黃國序(2006)。國民小學校長品牌管理態度與實施策略之研究-以台北縣公立國民小學為例。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文。未出版, 臺北。
    黃莉雯 (2007)。虛擬社群網站品牌建立與網站品牌權益評估。
    黃義良、馬惠祺 (2008)。國民小學品牌管理,學校效能及其關係之研究。初等教育學刊,30,63-84。
    葉連祺 (2003)。中小學品牌管理意涵和模式之分析。教育研究月刊,114,96-110。
    楊錦潭(2011)。2010臉書漫談。臺北市: 維科圖書(初版)。
    劉毓民(2000)。善用網路資訊科技提供消費者一對一的客製化服務。臺北市:ARC 遠擎管理顧問公司企業智慧部。
    蔡秉螢(2007)。幼兒園品牌領導策略之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    蔡進雄(2010)。論學校轉型為專業學習社群的校長領導作為。
    蔡進雄(2004)。領導新典範: 後英雄式領導的意涵及其對學校行政領導的啟示。教育政策論壇,七卷一期: 111-130.
    戴振浩(2011)。國民小學校長生涯專業發展規畫之研究。國立台北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,臺北市。
    魏惠娟 (2006)。台灣地區學校行銷研究評析及其對學校行銷策略規劃的啟示: 1984-2004的探索,教育政策論壇。
    谯璐璐 (2008)。下一个網絡霸主-FACEBOOK。商場現代化,25,65-66.

    英文部分
    Aaker, D. A. (2000). Brand leadership. UK: The Free Press.
    Alexa the web information company. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/.
    Retrieved March 29, 2008, from the World Wide Web: http://www.well.com/~hlr/texts/VCcivil.html.
    Anderson, R.E., & Dexter, S.L (2000).School technology leadership: Incidence and
    impact.teaching, learning, and computing: 1988 national survey, report #6. (ERIC
    Document Reproduction Service No.ED449786)
    Anonymous. (2010). How to...apply thought leadership to social media. PR News, 66(1),
    n/a-n/a.
    Bedbury, Scott, and Stephen Fenichell (2002). A new brand world: 8 principles for
    achieving brand leadership in the 21st Century. New York:Viking,Penguin.
    Bergstrom, A. (2000). Cyberbranding: Leverage your brand on the internet.Strategy & Leadership, 28(4), 10-15.
    Berry, L. (2000). Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the Academy of
    Marketing Science, 28(1), 128-137.
    Bollen (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Brooks-Young, S.(2006). Critical technology issues for school leaders. Thousand
    Oaks, CA: Corwin.
    Brown, J.S.& Duguid, P. (2001). Structure and spontaneity: Knowledge and
    Organization.London: Sage.
    Brugmann, J. & Prahalad, C. K. (2007). Cocreating business`s new social
    compact.Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 80.
    Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S& Kraut, R.et al. (2007). Community effort in online
    groups: Who does the work and why?.Human-Computer Interaction
    Institute,(11),90.
    Burton, S. (2011). Interactive or reactive? Marketing with twitter. Journal of Consumer
    Marketing, 28(7), 491-499.
    Carpenter, P. (2000). E-brands- building on internet business at breakneck
    speed. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Casaló, Luis V., Carlos Flavián and Miguel Guinaliu (2008), “Promoting Consumer’s
    Participation in Virtual Brand Communities: A New Paradigm in Brand Strategies,” Journal of Marketing Communication, 14(1), 19-36.
    CheckFacebook(2012). Facebook Marketing Statistics,Demographics,Reports & News. Retrieved March,05,2012 from www.checkFacebook.com
    Chernatony, L. D.,& William,M. G. (1989).Branding terminology the real rebate.
    Marketing Intelligence and Planning,10, pp.29-32.
    Constant, D., Lee, S., and Sara, K. (1996).The kindness of strangers: The usefulness
    of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 135.
    Dayal, S., Landesberg, H. and Zeisser, M. (2000). Building digital brands. The
    McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 42-51.
    Drucker, P. F. (1986). The changed world economy. Foreign Affairs, 64(4), 768-791.
    Drath, W. H. (1998). Approaching the future of leadership development.
    San Francisco: Jossey-Bass(pp.403-432).
    Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship.
    Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1): 210-230.
    Facebook, I.(2009). Facebook. Retrieved September, 14, 2009 from
    http://www.insidefaceboo2009/02/14/Facebook-surpasses-175-million-userscontinuing- to-grow-by-600k-usersday/
    Fernback, J. & Thompson, B. (1995). Virtual Communities: Abort, Retry, Failure?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Albuquerque:New Mexico.
    Freeman, C., 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Pinter Publishers, London.
    Figallo, C. (1998). Hosting web communities: building relationships, increasing customer loyalty, and maintaining a competitive edge. Chicester, UK: Wiley.
    Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 803-813.
    Fullan, M. (2002). Leadership and sustainability. Principal Leadership, 3(4), 14-17。
    Galunic, D. C. & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193-1201.
    Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application(4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
    Geering, A. D. (1992). Professional development needs of school principals.(ERIC
    Document Reproduction Service No.ED239370)
    Gilbert, R. (2006). Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the competition-innovation debate? The MIT Press.
    Hagel, J. & Armstrong, A. (1997). Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual
    communities.Harvard Business Press.
    Han, J. K., Kim,N. & Srivastva, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational
    performance: is innovation a missing link?The Journal of Marketing, 30-45.
    Hauknes, J. (1998). Services in innovation–innovation in services.STEP Report
    Series.
    Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange.American journal of Sociology,
    597-606.
    Holzner & Steven (2009). Facebook Marketing: Leverage Social Media to Grow Your Business. Indianapolis, IN: Que Publishing.
    Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K. & Chowdury, A.(2009). Micro-blogging as online word of mouth Branding. Social and Behavioral Sciences - Economics.
    Jöreskog, K. G.& Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications.Chicago:SPSS.
    Kapferer, J. N. (1997). Strategic brand management: Creating and sustaning brand equity long term (2nd ed.). Mildford, CT: Kogan Page US.
    Keasley, G., & Lynch, W. (1994).Educational technology leadeship perspectives.
    Englewoood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
    Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing
    brand equity.Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. (1997). Value innovation: the strategic logic of high growth. Harvard Business Review,75(1),102.
    Kirkpatrick, D. (2011). The Facebook effect: The inside story of the company that is
    connecting the world: Simon and Schuster.
    Koh, J. & Kim, Y.G. (2004). Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An e-Business perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 26, 155-166.
    Kotler, P. and Andreasen, A.R. (1991), Strategic Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations, 4th. ed.,Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    Krivak, T. (2008). Facebook 101: Ten Things You Need to Know About Facebook, 25(3). NJ: Information Today.
    Lagerweij, N.&Voogt ,J.& Seashore, L. K. (1998). School development and
    organizational learning: Toward an integrative theory.Organizational Learning
    in Schools, 237-260.
    Lambert, L. (1998).Building leadership capacity in school. US:Association for
    Supervision & Curriculum Development.
    Lee, F. S., Vogel, D. & Limayem, M. (2003).Virtual community informatics: Areview and research agenda. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(1), 47-61.
    Leithwood, K. A. & Riehl, C.(2005). What do we already know about educational
    leadership. A new agenda for research in educational leadership,12-27.
    Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M.,Wimmer, A.& Christakis, C. (2008). Tastes, ties,
    and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30 (4), 330-342.
    Magnusson, D. & Ekehammar, B. (1978). Similar situations--Similar behaviors? A
    study of the intraindividual congruence between situation perception and situation reactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 12(1), 41-48.
    McAlexander, James, H., Schouten, J. W. & Harold, F. K. (2002). Building
    brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(Jan.), 38-54.
    McGovern, G. (2000). The caring economy. Retrieved May 25, 2008, from theWorld Wide Web: http://www.thecaringeconomy.com.
    Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem.Psychology Today 2(1), 60-67.
    Mitchell, L. (2000). Branding equals smart e-business. Infoworld, 22(1), 47-48. Moreira, J.& Silva, M. J., Simões, J. & Sousa, G. (2012). Drivers of Marketing Innovation in Portuguese Firms. The Amfiteatru Economic Journal,14(31), 195-206.
    Morgan, B. (2007). Integrated marketing communication. International Business Review,16(4).
    Moser, M. (2003). United we brand: how to create a cohesive brand that`s seen, heard,
    and remembered.UK: Harvard Business Press.
    Mullen, C. A.&Hutinger, J. L.(2008). The principal`s role in fostering collaborative
    learning communities through faculty study group development. Theory Into Practice,47(4),276-285.
    Muniz, Albert, M. J.,Thomas,C,& Guinn, O. (2001). Brand Community. Journal
    of Consumer Research, 27(March), 412-432.
    Neumeier,M.(2003).The brand gap:How to bridge the distance between business strategy
    and design. Barkeley, CA:New Riders.
    O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next
    generation of software, Retrieved Sept 2005, from the
    http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
    Preece, J. (2000). Online Communities. Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
    Pike, S. (2005).The use of repertory grid analysis and importance-performance analysis to identify determinant attributes of universities. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2), 1-18.
    Ries, A. & Jack, T. (1981). Positioning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    Ries, A. and Ries, L. (2000). The 11 Immutable Laws of Internet Branding. USA:
    Harper Collins.
    Rethlefsen, M. L. (2010). Tools at Work: Facebook. Library Journal,135(12), 2.
    Rheingold, H.(1993). The virtual community: Finding commection in a computerized
    world. Boston, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman .
    Ridings, Catherin M., David Gefen, and Bay Arinze (2002). Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities. Journal of Strategic Information 30
    Systems, 11, 271-295.
    Rosen, A. (2009). E-Learning 2.0: Proven Practices and Emerging Technologies to Achieve Results.NY, American Management Association.
    Schneider, R. L. (2005). Marketing medical education: An examination of recruitment web sites for traditional and combined-degree MD programs. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2),19-36.
    Smith, M. A.& Leigh, B.(1997). Virtual subjects: Using the internet as an alternative
    source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, 29(4), 496-505.
    Smith, M. K. (1999). Peter Senge and the learning organization. Harvard Busines Review, 1-16.
    Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication.42 (4), 73-93.
    Peters, T. J. (1999). The circle of innovation: You can`t shrink your way to
    greatness.Vintage.
    Wasko, M. M. and Faraj, S. (2000). It is What One Does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice.Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155-173.
    Watkins, K. E. & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Consulting using action technologies. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (58), 81-90.
    Wellman, B. & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don`t ride alone: Virtual communities as
    communities.Networks in the Global Village,331-366.
    Wenger, E.C. and Snyder, W. M.(2000).Communities of practice: The organizational
    Frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139-145.
    Wikipedia.(2011). Social network service. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_network_service
    Wikipedia. (2011b). Facebook. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook
    Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational Innovation: Review, critique and suggested
    research directions. Journal of Management, 31(3): 405-431.
    Valdez, G. (2004). Technology leadership: Enchancing positive educational change.
    Retrieved August 31, 2006, from
    http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/educatrs/leadrshp/le700.htm
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育研究所
    99152026
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099152026
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    202601.pdf4231KbAdobe PDF2966View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback