English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 95905/126495 (76%)
Visitors : 31772622      Online Users : 432
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/76609
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76609

    Title: 師院生集中實習教學能力總結性評量之研究
    Authors: 謝文英;胡悅倫
    Hu, Yueh-Luen
    Contributors: 教育系
    Keywords: 教學能力評量標準;總結性評量;集中教育實習
    Teaching evaluation criteria;Summative evaluation;Educational practicum
    Date: 1995-06
    Issue Date: 2015-07-14 11:24:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在瞭解(一)師院生集中實習總結性評量所需的教學能力;(二)師院生集中實習教學能力總結性評量標準之重要性與鑑別度;(三)師院生集中實習教學能力總結性評量之相對重要性。 本研究以自編之「師院生集中實習教學能力總結性評量調查問卷」,對師院教授、國小校長、主任、教師及師院學生進行施,藉此調查問卷瞭解受試者對師院生集中實習教學能力總結性評量標準之重要性的看法。總結性評量調查問卷共發出1395份,回收問卷計1006收率為72.1%。本研究採用的統計方法有:信度考驗、描述統計、鑑別度分析、肯氏和諧度係數。 研究結果發現: 1. 師院生集中實習總結性評量在教學態度、教學計畫、教學方法、教學技術及教學評量上,所需的教學能力,計有20項教學行為,25項行為指標。 2. 師院生集中實習教學能力總結性評量,各項目之重要性均很好,鑑別度大致良好,為一良好的評量工類。 3. 師院生集中實習教學能力總結性評量最重要的教學能力依序為:(1)教學態度,(2)教學技術,(3)教學方法,(4)教學計畫,(5)教學評量。
    The main purpose of this study was to investigate summative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. The research objectives were as follows. 1. To understand what the summative teaching evaluation criteria are for student teachers. 2. To understand the importance and the index of discrimination of the summative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. 3. To understand the relative importance of the summative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. This study employed the self-devised “Summative Teaching Evaluation Criteria for Student Teacher Evaluation Questionnaire” and was administered to educational professors of teachers’ colleges, principals, grade principals, elementary teachers and teachers’ college students. A total of 1,006 of 1,395 questionnaires were returned, for a rate of 72.1%. Descriptive statistics, reliability, item discrimination, and Kendall’s W were employed to analyze the data collected. The findings showed that: 1. There were five areas of teaching performance of summative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. The five areas of teaching performance were teaching attitudes, teaching plans, teaching methods, teaching techniques and teaching evaluations. 2. The five areas of teaching performance included twenty teaching behaviors which included twenty-five teaching behavior indicators. 3. The most important area of teaching performance was teaching attitudes. The second was teaching techniques. The third was teaching methods. The fourth was teaching plans. The last was teaching evaluations. 4. The items of summative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers were rated as important on a Likert scale. The index of discrimination of those items was generally good.
    Relation: 初等教育學報(新竹師院), 3, 83-149
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback