English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140903 (78%)
Visitors : 46037754      Online Users : 1308
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/78525


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78525


    Title: 高等教育評鑑的另類思維—標竿學習
    Other Titles: The Alternative Thinking of Higher Education Evaluation: Benchmarking
    Authors: 郭昭佑
    Guo, Chao Yu
    Contributors: 教育系
    Date: 2013.04
    Issue Date: 2015-09-18 11:57:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來，隨著大學重視績效責任的潮流，世界先進各國無不以發展高等教育評鑑或是大學排名的方法，以確保高等教育的品質。然而，在高等教育的發展上，除了評鑑;排名等概念外，標竿學習（benchmarking）亦是重要概念之一。標竿學習是一種持續不斷;長期的;為改善組織績效的組織策略管理方法，期透過連續的;漸進的;向表現較佳的組織學習，以邁向卓越的共好歷程。標竿學習是一種實踐過程，藉由不斷地與其他學術機構的流程;策略;績效進行比較，分析探究對方在某方面的優異表現，並學習如何達成與對方相同優異的表現，使組織從比較中得到改善策略的資訊，逐步提升組織效能。標竿學習可以視為是有效協助策略性政策決定的現代管理工具，在高等教育環境中，要如何從標竿到標竿學習，是本研究關注的焦點。因此，本研究先探討標竿學習的意涵與標竿學習在高等教育上的應用，復以歐洲先進國家高等教育標竿學習計畫與實務作法進行探究，俾以做為臺灣高等教育評鑑未來發展方向之借鏡。
    In recent year, with the trend of accountability in universities, almost every advanced country in the world strives to ensure the quality of higher education through developing higher education evaluations and university rankings. However, benchmarking might be an alternative way. Benchmarking is a managerial tool that helps to improve organizational effectiveness. Benchmarking is also an incremental learning process in pursuit of excellence. Through constantly comparing with other organizations’ process, strategies and effectiveness, organization is able to learn from others’ advantages, and then tries to perform as good as them, or even better than them. Benchmarking can be view as an effective modern managerial tool that improves strategic policy decision making process. This study explored how to step from benchmark to benchmarking. Thus, this study explores the meaning of benchmarking and its application on higher education. Then, we analyzed benchmarking programs and practices in European countries as for future reference of higher education evaluation in Taiwan.
    Relation: 教育研究, 228, 63-75.
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/168063602013040228005
    DOI: 10.3966/168063602013040228005
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2707View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback